Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is just a bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro, having a overall score of 89 against 81. The Galaxy Note10 construction is notably newer and somewhat lighter, but somewhat thicker than the Galaxy C9 Pro. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit bigger screen, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a little higher pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy Note10 features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note10 counts with a better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a back camera with much less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a way larger aperture to take better low light photography and videos and a way higher video quality. The Galaxy C9 Pro has a little better battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.