Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a score of 81, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note4's 77.6 overall score. Galaxy C9 Pro's design is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy Note4's, although it is just a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note4 counts with a brighter display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater number of pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 256 GB and 64 GB internal storage. The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has 3 GB more RAM.
Galaxy Note4 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have a camera with a 16 megapixels resolution, the Galaxy Note4 also counts with a lot better video definition.
Galaxy C9 Pro has superior battery performance than Galaxy Note4, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.