Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a general score of 81, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note5's global score of 80.2. Galaxy C9 Pro's body is newer and a little thinner, but also just a bit heavier than the Galaxy Note5. The Galaxy Note5 features a much better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has an external memory slot that holds up to 256 GB. Galaxy Note5 features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture and a camera with a 16 mega-pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Note5 also has a lot higher (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.