Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has a score of 81, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note7's global score of 79.5. The Galaxy C9 Pro design is thinner but somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note7, and both were only released with a few months difference. Galaxy Note7 counts with a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Galaxy Note7's storage for applications and games is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro one, they have a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB and the same 64 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a bit better CPU than Galaxy Note7, because it has more cpu cores (although they are slower) and 2 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note7 takes slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lot lower 12 mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better photos in low light environments and a much higher (4K) video resolution. The Galaxy C9 Pro features a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.