Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-24 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is better than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, getting a score of 93.6 against 81. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a newer device than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it's just a little heavier and thicker.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy S10 5G has a better looking screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3040, a little bit larger display and a higher pixels count in each inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy S10 5G counts with a superior camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a back camera with way less MP, it also counts with a way larger camera aperture for better images and video in low-light environments and a way higher (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy S10 5G has a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.