Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's global score of 81. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a noticeably newer device than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, but it is heavier and incredibly thicker. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version and Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a lot higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution, a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a bigger display. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a camera with way more MP, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited situations and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.