Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is better than the Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 overall score. These phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. The Galaxy S22 Ultra design is notably newer than the Galaxy C9 Pro's, but it's somewhat heavier and noticeably thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bigger screen, a higher pixels density and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088px. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a bit bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much more mega pixels back camera, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture for better images in poorly lited environments.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.