Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2017-02-24 | -- |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | -- |
| 6.63 ounces | -- |
| Black and Gold | -- |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is a bit better than the Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 global score. Galaxy S25's body is lighter and way thinner than the Galaxy C9 Pro. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S25 has the older 14 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Galaxy S25 counts with a way better display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite higher screen density, a little bit larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. Galaxy C9 Pro features a bit more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a much powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy C9 Pro and Galaxy S25 both count with incredibly similar batteries. The Samsung Galaxy S25 shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a larger aperture for better photography and videos in low light situations, a way higher video quality and a much higher 50 MP resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.