Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2017-02-24 | -- |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | -- |
| 6.63 ounces | -- |
| Black and Gold | -- |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is much better than the Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 global score. Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is a lot thinner and way lighter than Galaxy C9 Pro. These devices have Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has an older 14 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit bigger display, a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen and a lot better 1440 x 3088 resolution. The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a way better performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bigger aperture to take better low light captures and videos, a much better video definition and a lot higher 200 mega-pixels resolution camera. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.