Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a general score of 83.3, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 overall score. Although the Samsung Galaxy S9 is thicker than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, it's lighter and also newer. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a more vivid display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater number of pixels per display inch and a way better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S9 has a little bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S9 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 400 GB. The Galaxy S9 counts with a little better performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy C9 Pro features improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 33 percent more battery size. The Galaxy S9 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a back camera with lot less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a way bigger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light environments and a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.