Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, getting a general score of 81 against 81. Galaxy XCover Pro's body is way newer than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's, but it is heavier and thicker. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a little bigger display and a just a bit greater display pixels density. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features slightly more memory for applications and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Galaxy XCover Pro features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better photography and video in low-light situations and a back facing camera with a way higher 25 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.