Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is a bit better than the Galaxy C9 Pro's general score of 81. Although the Galaxy Z Flip is a little thicker than the Galaxy C9 Pro, it's just a little lighter and notably newer. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip has older 12 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636, a little bit better display density and a little bit larger display.
Galaxy Z Flip has a superior camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a much less MP back facing camera, it also counts with a way better video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited environments. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy C9 Pro features greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.