Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is much better than the Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 general score. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the previous 11 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a much newer and a bit lighter cellphone than Galaxy C9 Pro, but it's also just a little bit thicker.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2636px resolution, a little bit larger display and a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 21% more battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a back facing camera with a way lower 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a lot better 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.