Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is better than Galaxy C9 Pro's global score of 81. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has older 11 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction has the same thickness than the Galaxy C9 Pro, but it's incredibly heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a higher 1768 x 2208px resolution, a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen and a bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a way worse 12 megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has much more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little longer battery duration than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.