Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Metal | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has a score of 81, which is a little bit better than Sony Xperia XZs's general score of 77.2. The Galaxy C9 Pro construction is heavier but somewhat thinner than the Sony Xperia XZs, and both were released only a couple months apart. The Xperia XZs features a bit sharper display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, the Xperia XZs also counts with a just a bit higher pixels count per screen inch.
The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Xperia XZs, because it has more RAM and more cores. The Sony Xperia XZs features a lot better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video, it also counts with a back-facing camera with more MP and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Xperia XZs, and although they both have a SD card slot that admits up to 256 GB, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has 64 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a really longer battery life than Xperia XZs, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.