Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.1 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black and White |
| Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a general score of 81, which is a little bit better than the Xperia Z4v's global score of 78.8. Galaxy C9 Pro's design is newer and thinner, but heavier than the Xperia Z4v. These devices have Android operating system, but the Galaxy C9 Pro has newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1 version.
Xperia Z4v counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have 8 processing cores, the Xperia Z4v also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Sony Xperia Z4v features a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a way higher pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a very superior storage to install applications and games than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. Sony Xperia Z4v counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a much higher 20.7 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy C9 Pro features improved battery performance than Xperia Z4v, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.