Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.1 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2015-09-02 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.08 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 545.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 3840 pixels (4K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 10.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 430 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 630 hours standby time 15.2 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a general score of 81, which is a bit better than the Xperia Z5 Premium's 79.8 global score. Even though Galaxy C9 Pro is a little bit heavier than the Xperia Z5 Premium, it's thinner and also newer. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy C9 Pro has newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while Xperia Z5 Premium has Android 5.1 version.
Xperia Z5 Premium features a much better display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 3840 x 2160px and a way greater screen density. Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Xperia Z5 Premium, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
Xperia Z5 Premium has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has 3 GB less RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xperia Z5 Premium also counts with an additional graphics processor. The Xperia Z5 Premium features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bigger camera aperture, a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a bit superior battery life than Xperia Z5 Premium, because it has a 17% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.