Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Blasting black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is much better than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, getting a overall score of 90.1 against 81. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro body is way newer than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's, although it's somewhat heavier and noticeably thicker. These phones have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a little faster CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a larger display, a way higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a better pixel count in each inch of display.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a way more mega pixels back facing camera, a much higher (4K) video quality and a bigger camera aperture.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has superior battery duration than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.