Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2022-04-04 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is slightly better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, having a global score of 81 against 78.7. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro construction is somewhat lighter and much thinner than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, even though it was released 5 years before. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has Android 12.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a way better hardware performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, although it has a just a little lower pixel count per inch of display, a bit smaller screen and a little worse 1080 x 1920 resolution.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a way better (4K) video quality, a larger camera aperture and a lot more megapixels back-facing camera. Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro counts with a much bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro features just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4650mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.