Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a general score of 83.8, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's overall score of 81. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's design is newer, but a bit heavier and somewhat thicker than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a bit better CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a same size screen, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has a bit more pixels per screen inch and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with greater battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has an 18% larger battery capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a way worse 12 MP resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations and a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.