Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Blue and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, having an 84.3 score against 81. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has older 14 version while Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Even though Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, it's much thinner and incredibly newer.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a way better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite better pixel density, a much higher resolution of 2224 x 2488 pixels and a lot larger screen. The Galaxy C9 Pro has a much greater processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bigger camera aperture for better captures and video in low light situations, a lot more MP back facing camera and a way better 7680x4320 video definition. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a much greater memory to install games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features greater battery performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 5100mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.