Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2021-05-26 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, having an 81 score against 79.5. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's construction is a little bit lighter and extremely thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. These devices work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has Android 11, providing lots of additional features and performance improvements.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has a bit sharper display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a just a bit greater pixel density, a bit larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a larger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and video. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has better battery duration than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.