Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-24 | -- |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black and Gold | -- |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a score of 86.1, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's general score of 81. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has the older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a somewhat thicker and just a little bit heavier cellphone than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro. Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has more pixels per inch in the screen, a much better resolution of 2080 x 2400 and a little bigger display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality and a lot more mega pixels back camera. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a little bit better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 256 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.