Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2019-01-15 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Blue and Red |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has an overall score of 81, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7's score of 80.3. Galaxy C9 Pro is an older and a bit heavier device than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, but Samsung was able to build it somewhat thinner anyway. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 counts with a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bigger display, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite better screen pixels density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also has a camera with much more mega pixels, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography and faster 120 fps video frame rate.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a SD memory slot that supports up to 256 GB, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also has 128 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7's battery lifetime is just as good as the battery performance in Galaxy C9 Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.