Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is slightly better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, with an 81.1 score against 81. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a way newer cellphone than the Galaxy C9 Pro, although it is much thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an older 10 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite greater pixels quantity per inch of screen, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little larger screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features just a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has superior battery life than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a much higher resolution back camera and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.