Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-02-07 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Ochre and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 11.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a little bit better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, having an 81 score against 76.6. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro construction is somewhat thinner than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, but it's a bit heavier and was released 3 years before. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has the previous 6.0 Marshmallow version while ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, a little bigger screen and a just a little more pixels per inch of display. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a superior storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. ZTE Axon 10s Pro has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much better video quality, a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution and a larger aperture for better low-light images and videos.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro's battery duration is very similar to the battery life in Galaxy C9 Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.