| Global Score | |
| 59.2 | 64.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-06-10 |
| 5.13 x 2.68 x 0.39 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 120.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 207 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 768 MB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
| 8.01 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.26 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 720 x 480 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.49 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Nokia 3.1 A is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Core 2, having a score of 64.8 against 59.2. The Nokia 3.1 A is a a bit thinner but somewhat heavier cellphone than Samsung Galaxy Core 2. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Nokia 3.1 A has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy Core 2 has Android 4.4.2, so it gives a couple additional features.
The Nokia 3.1 A has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Core 2, because it has a greater display pixel density, a larger display and a much higher 720 x 1440 resolution. Nokia 3.1 A counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy Core 2, and although they both have a Quad-Core processor, the Nokia 3.1 A also has more RAM.
Nokia 3.1 A takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy Core 2, because it has a lot more megapixels back facing camera and a way better 1920x1080 video resolution. Nokia 3.1 A features a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Core 2, because it has 32 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB.
The Nokia 3.1 A has a way better battery life than Galaxy Core 2, because it has a 2990mAh battery capacity instead of 2000mAh.
The Nokia 3.1 A is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.