Search


Compare phones

Global Score
59.264.8
Basic Information
SamsungNokia
Android 4.4.2Android 9.0 Pie
--2019-06-10
5.13 x 2.68 x 0.39 inches6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches
4.87 ounces5.50 ounces
Black and WhiteBlack
--Metal and Plastic
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 120.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
4.5 inches5.5 inches
480 x 800 pixels 1440 x 720 pixels
TFTIPS LCD
207 pixels per inch293 pixels per inch
Capacitive, Multi-touchNo touch screen
7.27.3
Performance
--Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset
Quad-Core 1200 MHz processorARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor
768 MB RAM2 GB RAM
Yes GPUAdreno 504 GPU
8.018.73
Storage
4 GB internal memory32 GB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slotmicroSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot
4.268.12
Camera
5.00 MP + 0.30 MP8.00 MP + 5.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
720 x 480 (30 fps) video resolution1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution
6.498.47
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
Mobile HotspotMobile Hotspot
HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSMLTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA
Micro SIM, Dual SIMNano SIM
4.66.1
Battery Life
2000mAh Li-Ion Battery2990mAh Battery
Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
3.924.96
Other Features
Bluetooth 4.0Bluetooth 5.0
GPSGPS
Accelerometer, Compass and Light SensorAccelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor
FM RadioFM Radio

Comparison review

Nokia 3.1 A is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Core 2, having a score of 64.8 against 59.2. The Nokia 3.1 A is a a bit thinner but somewhat heavier cellphone than Samsung Galaxy Core 2. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Nokia 3.1 A has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy Core 2 has Android 4.4.2, so it gives a couple additional features.

The Nokia 3.1 A has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Core 2, because it has a greater display pixel density, a larger display and a much higher 720 x 1440 resolution. Nokia 3.1 A counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy Core 2, and although they both have a Quad-Core processor, the Nokia 3.1 A also has more RAM.

Nokia 3.1 A takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy Core 2, because it has a lot more megapixels back facing camera and a way better 1920x1080 video resolution. Nokia 3.1 A features a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Core 2, because it has 32 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB.

The Nokia 3.1 A has a way better battery life than Galaxy Core 2, because it has a 2990mAh battery capacity instead of 2000mAh.

The Nokia 3.1 A is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.