Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Core LTE
SM-G386F| Global Score | |
| 61.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-02-17 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.23 x 2.61 x 0.39 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and White | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 345.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super PLS LCD | OLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Dual-Core 1200 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has an overall score of 82.9, which is way better than the Samsung Galaxy Core LTE's overall score of 61.4. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a has the older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Core LTE has Android 4.2.2. The Google Pixel 4a has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy Core LTE, because it has a bigger display, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and much more pixels per inch in the screen.
Google Pixel 4a counts with much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Core LTE, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 4a features a better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Core LTE, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
Google Pixel 4a captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Core LTE, because it has a way more megapixels back-facing camera and a lot better 3840x2160 video definition. Google Pixel 4a counts with a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Core LTE, because it has 3140mAh of battery capacity instead of 2100mAh.
The Google Pixel 4a costs a bit more money than Galaxy Core LTE, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.