| Global Score | |
| 62.3 | 68.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-07-15 |
| 5.17 x 2.69 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.03 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| -- | Carbon grey, Ocean green and Sky blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 139.00 | $ 126.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 207 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| -- | MediaTek Helio G25 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.06 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.82 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Xiaomi Redmi 9A is slightly better than the Galaxy Core Prime, having a general score of 68.2 against 62.3. Xiaomi Redmi 9A's body has the same thickness than Galaxy Core Prime, but it is notably heavier. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi 9A has the older 10 version and Galaxy Core Prime has Android 4.4.4 version.
Xiaomi Redmi 9A features a superior CPU than Galaxy Core Prime, because it has more cores and more RAM. The Galaxy Core Prime features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9A, although it has a much lower resolution of 800 x 480, a lot smaller display and a little inferior amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
Xiaomi Redmi 9A captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy Core Prime, because it has a lot higher (Full HD) video quality and a back facing camera with a way higher 13 mega pixels resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi 9A counts with a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Core Prime, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 32 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi 9A has a superior battery performance than Galaxy Core Prime, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Xiaomi Redmi 9A is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.