Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-03-22 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.22 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 has a general score of 85, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy F23's 84.6 global score. The iPhone 8 counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a quite worse quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a lot smaller screen and a lot worse 750 x 1334 resolution.
IPhone 8 features a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. IPhone 8 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower resolution, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture.
The iPhone 8 features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy F23, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy F23 has a much better battery lifetime than iPhone 8, because it has a 175% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.