Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-03-22 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F23 has a general score of 84.6, which is slightly better than iPhone XS Max's global score of 84.5. The Samsung Galaxy F23 body is extremely newer and lighter than iPhone XS Max's, but it is a bit thicker. IPhone XS Max counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a little higher 1242 x 2688 resolution.
IPhone XS Max features a quite better processing power than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. Galaxy F23 features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than iPhone XS Max, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
The Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a camera in the back with way less MP, they both have the same aperture. The Galaxy F23 has a much longer battery life than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.