Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-03-22 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F23 has an overall score of 84.6, which is slightly better than the LG V30's general score of 79.1. The Galaxy F23 body is noticeably newer and incredibly lighter than LG V30's, but it's also thicker. The LG V30 has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and more pixels per display inch.
The LG V30 counts with a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy F23, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG V30 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy F23. They have 4 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores.
LG V30 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy F23, because although it has a lot worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos. Galaxy F23 features a really longer battery life than LG V30, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.