Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-03-22 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F23 is a bit better than LG V50 ThinQ, getting a general score of 84.6 against 83.7. Both phones we compare here include Android OS, but the Galaxy F23 has the newer 12 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10 version, so it offers some additional features and performance enhancements. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels amount per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
The LG V50 ThinQ has much more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy F23, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy F23, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy F23 counts with improved battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a lot worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.