Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2022-03-22 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| -- | 6.21 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F23 is a little bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, with an 84.6 score against 77.9. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy F23 has 12 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Galaxy F23's construction is way newer, incredibly lighter and noticeably thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a better display than Galaxy F23, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a greater screen pixels density. Galaxy F23 features a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal storage.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a GPU. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy F23, although it has a back facing camera with lot less megapixels and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video.
The Galaxy F23 counts with better battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.