Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-03-22 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.09 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is just a bit better than Galaxy F23, having an 87.1 score against 84.6. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a greater display pixel density.
Galaxy Note9 features a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy F23, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note9 also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy Note9 features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy F23, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note9 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note9 features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light environments. The Samsung Galaxy F23 counts with improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.