Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-03-22 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.31 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.35 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F23 has a general score of 84.6, which is just a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro's global score of 78.8. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy F23 has 12 version and vivo X60 Pro has Android 11, providing the user lots of additional features and some performance improvements. The Galaxy F23 design is newer and extremely lighter, but just a little thicker than vivo X60 Pro.
The vivo X60 Pro features just a little better processing power than Galaxy F23, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a just a bit inferior count of pixels per screen inch and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2376, they both have a display of the same size.
Vivo X60 Pro features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a worse 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, they both have a F1.8 aperture. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy F23, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy F23 features longer battery life than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.