Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-03-22 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy F23, with an 85.5 score against 84.6. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy F23, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a slightly better display than Galaxy F23, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2246 pixels and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel density.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy F23, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB and 128 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a camera with a much lower 12 megapixels resolution and a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs or videos in low light environments.
The Galaxy F23 features better battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.