Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-16 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F41 has a general score of 85.2, which is slightly better than LG V50 ThinQ's 83.7 score. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy F41 has a newer 11 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10. Even though the Galaxy F41 is newer than LG V50 ThinQ, it's a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater pixels count per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 3120 resolution. LG V50 ThinQ has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy F41. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
LG V50 ThinQ has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy F41, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy F41 takes much better pictures and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution and a lot larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 features a really longer battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 50% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.