Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F41 has a score of 85.2, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50's score of 81.2. Even being the best we are comparing here, Galaxy F41 is a older, thicker and just a little bit heavier cellphone than Motorola Edge 50. Both devices in this review have Android OS, but Galaxy F41 has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version.
The Galaxy F41 has a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 50 features a sharper screen than Galaxy F41, because it has much more brightness, a little better quantity of pixels in each display inch, a little bit bigger screen and a quite better 1220 x 2712 resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy F41 counts with superior battery duration than Motorola Edge 50, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Galaxy F41 captures just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a lot more mega pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.