Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-16 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F41 is a bit better than the Moto Z4, having a general score of 85.2 against 79.8. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy F41 has a newer 11 version while Moto Z4 has Android 10 version, offering a couple additional features. Although Samsung Galaxy F41 is newer than the Moto Z4, it's thicker and heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 has just a bit better performance than Moto Z4, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy F41 has a little sharper screen than Moto Z4. Both of them have a same size screen, a higher number of pixels per screen inch and exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Galaxy F41 takes a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a back camera with a way higher resolution and a larger back camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos.
The Motorola Moto Z4 features a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy F41, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy F41 has a much longer battery lifetime than Moto Z4, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.