Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-16 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy F41, with a overall score of 87.1 against 85.2. Galaxy Note9's construction has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy F41, but it's just a bit heavier. The Galaxy Note9 counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy F41, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy Note9 also has a better pixels density and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy F41. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and 6 GB of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy F41 features a better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and videos in low-light environments and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also counts with a much bigger sensor shooting way better quality photos and a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Galaxy Note9 counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy F41, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB, the Galaxy Note9 also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy F41 features a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.