Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Black and White |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F41 has a score of 85.2, which is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's overall score of 77.8. The Galaxy F41 body is somewhat lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it is incredibly thicker and was released many years before. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy F41 has the previous 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with an incredibly better display than Galaxy F41, because it has a little more pixels per inch of display, a bigger display, a way brighter screen and a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution. Galaxy F41 has an extremely better CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy F41, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has a camera with much less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography, a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot higher video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 features just a bit longer battery life than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because it has a 5 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.