Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F41 is a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro, having an 85.2 score against 78.8. These phones use the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Even being the best we are comparing, we must highlight that it's also a just a little bit heavier and thicker device. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy F41 features a bit sharper display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Vivo X60 Pro features a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 captures a bit better photographs and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also counts with a back camera with lot more mega pixels and a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy F41 has a really longer battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 43% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.