Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than the iPhone 8, having an 88.1 score against 85. Even though the Galaxy F62 is incredibly newer than iPhone 8, it is thicker and much heavier. The Galaxy F62 counts with a little more vivid display than iPhone 8, because although it has way darker display, it also counts with a really bigger screen, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Apple iPhone 8 counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy F62, because although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU and more CPU cores. The Galaxy F62 features a bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone 8, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Galaxy F62 features a superior battery lifetime than iPhone 8, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy F62 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality and a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a way more megapixels camera in the back and a much bigger camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.