Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a bit better than the iPhone XS Max, with a score of 88.1 against 84.5. Although Samsung Galaxy F62 is newer than iPhone XS Max, it is thicker and a little heavier. The Apple iPhone XS Max has a faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a 64 bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels amount in each display inch, a brighter display and a bit higher 1242 x 2688 resolution. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than iPhone XS Max, because it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy F62 has a really longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 120 percent larger battery capacity. The Galaxy F62 takes better videos and photos than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.