Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2024-01-08 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Phantom Black and Rebel Grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | QualcommSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 7.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is slightly better than Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro's global score of 84.2. Galaxy F62's body is a little bit lighter than the Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro, but it is just a little bit thicker and was released many years before. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy F62 has an older 11 version while Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has Android 14 version.
The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch of display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro also counts with a little bigger display and a lot brighter screen.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with an extremely better processor than Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster). The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro counts with a bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features greater battery life than Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro, because it has a 27 percent more battery size. The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro takes a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy F62, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and a much worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.