Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than the Google Nexus 6P's overall score of 80.3. Galaxy F62's design is newer, but way thicker and somewhat heavier than the Google Nexus 6P. Galaxy F62 features a little better hardware performance than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with more RAM memory.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy F62 takes a lot better photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy F62 also has a back-facing camera with a much better resolution, a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger camera aperture to take better photography and video in low-light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a superior battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 7000mAh battery size instead of 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.