Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 2, having an 88.1 score against 81.6. The Samsung Galaxy F62 construction is incredibly newer, but heavier and somewhat thicker than the Google Pixel 2. The Google Pixel 2 and Samsung Galaxy F62 feature incredibly similar processors, because although the Google Pixel 2 has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores (but slower).
Galaxy F62 counts with a little bit better looking display than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a just a little lower display density, it also counts with a lot bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Galaxy F62 has a superior storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy F62 also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 7000mAh battery size. Galaxy F62 has a lot better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video definition, a same size aperture and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy F62 also has a way bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.