Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Blue and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a little bit better than Google Pixel XL, with a global score of 88.1 against 81.3. Even though the Samsung Galaxy F62 is extremely newer than the Google Pixel XL, it's noticeably heavier and a little bit thicker. The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have a Quad-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel XL has a little sharper screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Galaxy F62 shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Galaxy F62 also has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution, a lot bigger camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a superior memory for apps and games than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 has a way better battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 103% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.