Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a global score of 88.1, which is much better than the LG V20's 77 score. The Galaxy F62 construction is noticeably newer than the LG V20's, but it is thicker and incredibly heavier. The LG V20 features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better number of pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy F62 has a slightly better storage capacity for apps and games than LG V20, because although it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy F62 has just a little better hardware performance than LG V20, and although they both have 4 processing cores, the Galaxy F62 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy F62 features a lot better camera than LG V20, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy F62 also has a much more megapixels back facing camera and a way bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a superior battery performance than LG V20, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.